Home  |  About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Donate  |  Email Alerts  |  Accomplishments



Federal agencies file Second Motion To Dismiss CAIR lawsuit that seeks to invalidate No Fly List.

Please urge US District Judge Paula Xinis to dismiss this case before it goes to a jury.


Click here to send your email to encourage District Judge Paula Xinis to make public safety the priority and keep air travel safe in Rami Khaled El Ali et al v. Matthew Whitaker et al by dismissing this case before it goes to a jury.

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has filed two lawsuits which seek to eliminate major tools used by law enforcement and Corporate America to keep millions of Americans safe.

In one case, CAIR sued the Department of Homeland Security, Terrorist Screening Center, National Counterterrorism Center, Transportation Security Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Customs and Border Protection on April 5, 2016.  The lawsuit challenges the validity of the Terror Screening Database, the official name for the terror watch list that is used by law enforcement and the private sector to protect hundreds of millions of Americans from terrorism.   United States District Judge Anthony J. Trenga heard final arguments from CAIR attorneys and United States government attorneys on April 4, 2019 regarding CAIR’s legal challenge to the terror watch list.  Proposed Summary Judgements from Plaintiffs and Defendants have been filed.  The case is now in Judge Trenga’s hands for a ruling.

In another case (this case), CAIR sued several federal agencies to challenge the validity of the No Fly List which protects millions of travelers from terrorism.  

On December 14, 2018, attorneys representing several federal agencies filed a Motion To Dismiss the lawsuit filed by the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) that seeks to invalidate the No Fly List. 

The case against the No Fly List was headed for a hearing on the federal agencies' Motion To Dismiss when CAIR attorneys for the plaintiffs filed amended complaints after it appeared that the federal agencies' motions to dismiss would likely to succeed.   

On April 29, 2019, federal agencies filed a Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Lieutenant General Robert P. Ashley, Jr., William Barr, Ken Blanco, Jonathan R. Cantor, L. Francis Cissna, Daniel R. Coats, John C Demers, David J. Glawe, Gina Haspel, Charles H Kable, IV, Joseph Maguire, Kevin K. McAleenan, James W. McCament, John Mitnick, Steven Mnuchin, General Paul M. Nakasone, Kirstjen Nielson, David P. Pekoske, Mike Pompeo, Cameron Quinn, Tracy Renaud, Patrick M. Shanahan, Watchlisting Advisory Council, Beth A. Williams, Peter A. Winn, Christopher Wray.

CAIR attorneys for the plaintiffs have until June 13, 2019 to file a response to the Second Motion to Dismiss. 

The lawsuit to invalidate the No Fly list was originally announced on August 8, 2018.  The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a news release titled: CAIR Files Broad Challenge to Watchlisting System, Including TSA's Quiet Skies Program.  CAIR’s press release on the filing of this lawsuit states:  “Quiet Skies punishes those who—through family, community or the workplace—have relationships with individuals the federal government has designated as a ‘known or suspected terrorist.’”

Many people who apply for special agent at the Federal Bureau of Investigation are denied that opportunity because of their “family, community or workplace relationships.”    This FBI procedure results in providing the best possible public safety for all Americans.  Should this FBI procedure be invalidated because of alleged discrimination?  Since evaluating these FBI applicant “relationships” results in improved public safety and public trust how much more so does evaluating air travelers’ “relationships” with known terrorists protect the lives of hundreds of innocent people who travel on one aircraft and increase public confidence of millions of people in air travel?

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), who brought this legal challenge, has a very long list of projects and lawsuits that have vigorously opposed numerous counter-terrorism surveillance measures, policies, training procedures and training personnel.  It would be very difficult to find a counter-terrorism measure that is supported by CAIR.

Additionally, many CAIR officials have “family, community or workplace relationships” with terrorists who have been sentenced to prison and/or deported for supporting terrorism.   These CAIR officials include: Ghassan Elashi - founder of CAIR’s Texas chapter, Mousa Abu Marzook, Randall  Royer - CAIR’s former civil rights coordinator, Bassem Khafagi - CAIR’s  former  community relations director, Rabih Haddad - a  former CAIR fundraiser, Siraj Wahhaj - CAIR’s advisory board member, Muthanna Al-Hanooti - former head of CAIR's Michigan branch and Nabil Sadoun - a former CAIR board member.  Numerous CAIR officials have defended terrorists.  Hussam Ayloush, CAIR L.A. director, blamed America for the San Bernardino terrorist attack.  Ahmed Bedier, then CAIR Tampa director, defended Sami Al Arian who was indicted and plead to federal charges of raising support for Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a terrorist organization.

Yet, with all of these questionable “relationships” many CAIR officials, employees and members are not listed on the no-fly list.  Therefore, the people who are on the no-fly list most likely have relationships or circumstances with known terrorists that are far more risky to public safety.

El Ali et al v. Sessions et al Case No. 8:18-cv-02415-PX  was assigned to District Court Judge Paula Xinis of the United States District Court, District of Maryland.   Judge Xinis issued an order on November 2, 2018 approving Defendants' Joint Motion to Set Briefing Schedule and Page Limits for Official Capacity Defendants' Anticipated Motion to Dismiss.  The Defendant federal agencies filed a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit on December 14, 2018.

El Ali et al v. Sessions et al Case No. 8:18-cv-02415-PX  was assigned to District Court Judge Paula Xinis of the United States District Court, District of Maryland.  

Plaintiffs have demanded a jury for this trial.

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to encourage District Judge Paula Xinis to make public safety the priority and keep air travel safe in El Ali et al v. Sessions et al by dismissing this case before it goes to a jury.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the "Send Your Message" button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.

Click here to send your email to encourage District Judge Paula Xinis to make public safety the priority and keep air travel safe in El Ali et al v. Sessions et al by dismissing this case before it goes to a jury.


Contact Information:

District Court Judge Paula Xinis
United States District Court, District of Maryland
6500 Cherrywood Lane, Suite 400
Greenbelt, MD 20770
(301) 344-0653

judge_paula_xinis@mdd.uscourts.gov


Author: ffa   20190224   Category: CAIR  FFA: on
Tags: CAIR, Safe Skies, No-fly list
DONATE         CONTACT


Copyright 2010-2019